BannedSupplementsPeptide evidence & claim reviews
← All peptide reviews

Tissue repair research · Evidence review

TB-500

Are studies of a related molecule being confused with TB-500?

Why a trial of thymosin beta-4 eye drops cannot validate injectable TB-500 recovery claims.

What was actually studied

Adults with dry eye received a thymosin beta-4 ophthalmic formulation, not injectable TB-500.

What the paper found

  • The selected trial missed its primary endpoints; some secondary outcomes improved.

Where the claim goes beyond the evidence

  • The tested formulation, route, and condition differ from TB-500 injury-recovery claims.
  • FDA identifies TB-500 as a thymosin beta-4 fragment; it should not be treated as interchangeable with the trial product.

Safety context

FDA describes immune-response and impurity concerns and missing human exposure information for the TB-500 fragment.

A research summary cannot establish that a product is suitable for you. Clinical decisions belong with a qualified health professional.

Read the original sources

  1. Original research — PubMed abstractThymosin beta 4 ophthalmic solution for dry eye: a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase II clinical trial conducted using the controlled adverse environment (CAE™) model. ↗
  2. FDA safety informationCertain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks ↗

Keep reading

Another claim. Another closer look.

BPC-157 ↗GHK-Cu ↗Ipamorelin ↗